Independent guidance on the services practices actually buy. The full provider directory sits behind every topic.
Paneling, payer enrollment, CAQH, timelines, vendor selection.
In-house vs outsource, pricing models, coding, payer contracts.
EHR selection by specialty, migration, practice-management software.
Consultants, MSOs, startup engagements, vetting and costs.
The same published criteria, applied the same way to every EHR we evaluate. Built to be cited and embedded.
| Vendor | Best for | Turnaround | Specialty depth | Pricing model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTebra (Kareo)All-in-one platform |
All-in-one for independent practices | not yet scored | not yet scored | Subscription | Full evaluation → |
AathenahealthNetworked platform |
Billing-focused practices | not yet scored | not yet scored | % of collections | Full evaluation → |
SSimplePracticeBehavioral health platform |
Mental & behavioral health | not yet scored | not yet scored | Subscription | Full evaluation → |
EElation HealthPrimary care EHR |
Independent primary care | not yet scored | not yet scored | Subscription | Full evaluation → |
PFPractice FusionWeb-based EHR |
Cash-constrained startups | not yet scored | not yet scored | Free tier | Full evaluation → |
CCureMDGroup platform |
Multi-location independent groups | not yet scored | not yet scored | Subscription | Full evaluation → |
Our flagship EHR comparison: twelve systems reviewed for the 1-10 provider independent practice, with best-for verdicts by specialty, billing model, and budget.
Top systems compared by use case for behavioral-health solos and groups.
The selection framework: workflow fit, billing fit, implementation risk, and data control.
Pricing models, implementation costs, hidden fees, and total cost of ownership.
The structured demo and evaluation script that exposes weak fits before you sign.
How to switch EHR systems without losing revenue, data, or your schedule.
What independent practices actually need -- and when one platform should do both.
Five platforms reviewed for solo and group practices.
The working toolkit: requirements worksheet, scoring matrix, and demo checklist.
Every EHR we cover is assessed against the same five published criteria by the GPH editorial team -- before any commercial conversation. Vendors can't buy a verdict, change a weighting, or remove a finding. Verdicts today are criteria-based editorial judgments; numeric scoring will be published as our evaluation program matures.
v1.0 · weights total 100%
Free, neutral, no email required. They point to a route, not a vendor that paid us.
A few questions about your specialty, size, and billing model -- get the EHR profile that fits your practice.
Take the quizVerified healthcare IT and EHR providers from the GPH directory. The full list lives in the directory.
Selection basis: directory verification status and published directory score. Verification reflects a claimed-and-reviewed listing -- it is not an editorial verdict, and it is not for sale in editorial surfaces. Order is alphabetical.
Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · Anchorage, AK · Directory score 85/100.
Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · Tucson, AZ · Directory score 85/100.
Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · North Little Rock, AR · Directory score 85/100.
Verified healthcare IT & EHR provider · Glendale, AZ · Directory score 85/100.
No sponsored placements are currently running in this category. Sponsored placements always appear in this separate, labeled block -- never in the editorial shortlist.
Are you a healthcare IT or EHR provider? Sponsored placements are available →
Looking for more? Browse every healthcare IT and EHR provider -- filter by state and specialty.